We
all are human beings and religions were developed in medieval times to make a
better human beings and a better human society. The Muslim intellectuals of
Middle East developed a very orthodox version of Islam by incorporating many
things – some from Islam and some by themselves. There is no command for beard
or circumcision but these were made sole identification for Muslim male. The
command for purdah is not as presented by them. The commands for war and death
penalty were for specific occasions and not as now understood by them and at least
war means war with those who fight and not killing of non-fighting men, women
and children and never one done by suicide.
Same
religion, same Scripture and same teachings by Prophet would have taken in
entirely different ways by people of other places if these had come there as in
India or China or Japan.
If
Jews of Israel start killing on plea that their religion is truest and first
religion then it must not be reason to find fault with Judaism or their
Scripture or Prophet and such fanaticism is still found in some Jews and
Christians though they are tiny minority whereas fanatic Muslims are in
majority and there are non-religious reasons for that.
Why
majority of Middle East’s Muslims are fanatic ?
First
it is not necessary that majority of Muslims are fanatic as a powerful minority
keeps fanaticism prevalent. The religion was misused to keep women and other
people subjugated as in Europe Inquisitions were instituted.
It is human
weakness that every man wants his wife to be virgin at time of marriage and to
remain loyal throughout her life and he covets other women himself. The men of
Middle East developed whole religion and social system based upon it – women
were confined in to purdah and when adultery was suspected she was stoned to
death.
Then same men
want to save their faith by killing any person who raises doubt or says
something of such nature. So they are killing Sufis, Shias and others on charge
of heresy/blasphemy. They and others quote their Scripture or Prophet but
similar things are in Old Testament but majority of present day Jews and Christians
based their religion on those things.
Here
in India, here was one noble Muslim who later became Judge High Court. His wife
used to take Music lessons from a Sikh teacher and then one day she eloped with
her teacher leaving behind two small daughters. Then later she returned and in
the mean time her daughter had grown and become advocate and she lived with her
daughters perhaps in the same house of her living husband. So there is something
specific with Muslims of Middle East who get their wives killed on charge of
adultery.
So
if there be true democracy in Middle East then hopefully if open minded people are in majority then
fanaticism will become a thing of past as it has been discarded by other
people.
If
majority opts for fanaticism then whole modern civilized World may coerce them
to come in line and adopt modern laws and Universal Declaration of Human Rights
1948 as South Africa was coerced to end apartheid.
Thus instead of blaming Islam and Scripture and Prophet the civilized World
must take fanaticism as social pathology of particular people and must
institute treatment and prophylaxis like any disease.